The Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that an employment tribunal’s £10,000 for injury to feelings award for pregnancy/maternity discrimination was manifestly excessive. The only act of pregnancy/maternity discrimination found by the employment tribunal was that the employer had failed to take adequate steps to deal with a grievance which the employee had twice emailed to it, but which had been blocked by its firewall. As there was limited evidence of injury, the Employment Appeal Tribunal concluded that the award was perverse and substituted an award of £2,000.
Ms Graham was one of nine employees at risk of redundancy. Four new roles were being created. As Ms Graham was pregnant, she asserted her statutory right to be offered one of the new roles in preference to others, arguing it was a suitable available vacancy. Eddie Stobart denied the role was suitable for her and required her to attend a competitive interview. She attended an interview but was unsuccessful.
Ms Graham emailed a grievance but received no response. When she queried this, she was was told to resend it, which she did. When her redundancy was confirmed, she mentioned her unanswered grievance and the HR manager said she would look into it. It later transpired that Ms Graham’s emails had been blocked by the company’s IT firewall system.
While the tribunal accepted that the two grievance emails had been blocked by the company’s firewall, the company knew she was saying she had raised a grievance, and it had not done enough to follow this up. It awarded her £10,000 for injury feelings.
Eddie Stobart appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, arguing that the award of £10,000 was so excessive that it was perverse. The Employment Appeal Tribunal agreed.
There was limited evidence of injury in this case. The employment tribunal had found there to be a “degree of upset” but there had been no finding that the injury endured beyond the immediate experience of the detriment, and no finding of any adverse effect on Ms Graham’s work, personal life or quality of life.
Given the scant evidence of injury, it had been open to the tribunal to look at the manner of discrimination. Here the discrimination was plainly not overt, it was a one-off act and there was no evidence of ridicule or humiliation.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal and substituted an award of £2,000, which is towards the lower end of the bottom Vento band.
An employment tribunal cannot make an injury to feelings award if there is no evidence of injury but where evidence is otherwise sparse, an employment tribunal may take the manner of discrimination into account in order to infer the level of upset caused. Relevant factors include:
- The frequency and duration of exposure to the discriminatory conduct
- Whether the discrimination is overt
- The existence of ridicule or humiliation, and
- Whether it is an act of pregnancy discrimination involving an unborn child.
Source: Lexology
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
