In the case of Smith v Teleperformance Ltd, Steven Smith has won more than £5000 after he was sacked for complaining about only getting three chicken nuggets for lunch.
An employment tribunal heard how Steven Smith was left “shocked” and “disillusioned” at the size of the £1.99 portion he was handed at the Teleperformance office canteen. When he queried why others were getting four or five nuggets, he said he felt “antagonised” when he was told he could get three more for an extra 99p.
Mr Smith, who was suspended that day pending an investigation, was accused of having “acted aggressively” towards a female member of staff. The woman who served him the meal told the tribunal he had “forcefully” pushed the box of food away and “stormed off” leaving her “stomach churning”.
The incident was reported to the company and Mr Smith was later sacked under the grounds of gross misconduct, claiming he had acted “violently”.
However, the employment tribunal, held remotely, ruled in Mr Smith’s favour, stating: “Having carefully reflected upon this and considered the evidence led before the Tribunal I have concluded that the respondent’s investigation fell outwith the range of responses open to a reasonable employer.”
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
