In Davies v Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, D is disabled because of substantial medical problems related to the menopause, including lacking concentration. D noticed the water jug on her desk had been emptied and could not remember if she had diluted her medication into the water. She became concerned when she saw two men drinking water nearby. She approached them explaining her concerns and one of the men became upset. SCTS investigated the matter and although it became apparent that D had been confused and the medication was not in the water, D was dismissed for breaching health and safety rules and SCTS values and behaviours. The ET held that D’s dismissal was unfair and amounted to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of her disability. Her conduct was affected by her disability because it caused her to be confused and forgetful about whether she had taken her medication and whether she had put it in the water jug. While the SCTS had the legitimate aim of having honest and trustworthy staff, dismissal was not a proportionate response when taking into account the impact of her disability. The ET ordered that D be reinstated to her previous job and be paid £19,000 to account for arrears of pay and compensate for injury to feelings.

This update provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for more information.  Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.