When a Coldplay concert and employees collide

You will have undoubtedly seen the viral memes, news coverage and not-so-well-thought-out generalised responses to ‘that’ Coldplay concert footage. What started with innocent intention as someone capturing a seemingly romantic moment at the concert, has snowballed into investigations, allegations and resignations for all the world to see (and judge). Not to mention, the conversations in boardrooms across the world that have followed.

You will have undoubtedly seen the viral memes, news coverage and not-so-well-thought-out generalised responses to ‘that’ Coldplay concert footage. What started with innocent intention as someone capturing a seemingly romantic moment at the concert, has snowballed into investigations, allegations and resignations for all the world to see (and judge). Not to mention, the conversations in boardrooms across the world that have followed.

It’s easy to dismiss this as just another social media storm, but for lawyers (and employers) it’s a perfect case study on how operations can unravel overnight when personal and professional lives collide.

Think their privacy has been invaded? Think again! People often think that they have more rights to privacy than they actually do. The harsh reality is that once you’re in a public space, especially somewhere like a concert venue with one of the biggest bands in the world, you’re fair game for filming and photography. Not to mention that there would have been mobile phones everywhere that night.

It might feel intrusive, but it’s not illegal unless it crosses into harassment, defamation or breach of data protection laws, which this doesn’t appear to do. The event organisers aren’t liable either, they can’t control every phone in a 60,000-capacity venue.

Moving swiftly on to the repercussions that have followed that now infamous footage – the resignation of CEO Andy Byron and the ongoing situation with Kristin Cabot which has of course raised some eyebrows, and is where things get murky for employers in the legal sense. Particularly around whether both individuals are being treated equally. This is where employers could find themselves in hot water if they don’t follow correct procedures and policy.

If there’s any perception of unfair treatment from either Mr Byron or Ms Cabot, there could be a discrimination claim waiting in the wings. Employers need to demonstrate that they have the same procedures and apply the same standards for all employees, regardless of their job title or gender.

If someone feels they’ve been treated unfairly, they could potentially pursue claims for unfair dismissal or breach of contract. If either individual wanted to bring a claim it would typically start with raising an appeal against any sanction or grievance internally.

If unresolved, they could proceed to an employment tribunal, but they’d need to evidence how the company has acted unreasonably or discriminatorily. It’s a high bar; especially if the employer followed its internal procedures and could fully justify the position.

One question that keeps coming up is why only one person has resigned so far. From a legal standpoint, that’s actually irrelevant and there’s no legal obligation to resign.

The CEO may have chosen to step down early to avoid formal proceedings, and because of the risk of reputational damage to himself, or the business. That decision shouldn’t determine how others are treated in this particular circumstance. What matters, as i’ve said, is that companies follow fair and stringent policies and procedures for all parties. If not, it opens the door to discrimination claims.

As for Ms Cabot, we don’t know her personal reasons, but there’s not a legal obligation on her to resign. If it finds that either individual brought the company into disrepute, it could justify termination, even when it happened outside of work.

So, what should companies do when private drama becomes public property? Move quickly, and don’t panic! Under UK employment law, employees are contractually expected to act in a way that does not damage the reputation of their employer. It’s also important to remember that despite this incident being a viral sensation over the last few days, all other employees are watching closely to see whether their employer acts with integrity when the pressure is on.

As our personal and professional lives become increasingly intertwined and social media seems to the root cause of many a controversy these days, incidents like this are inevitable. Companies that weather these storms successfully are the ones with clear policies, consistent messaging and the courage to do the right thing even when the whole world is watching.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Wellbeing pays: the ROI HR can’t ignore

9 October 2025

Skills

7 October 2025

How to build a skills-based strategy

A key challenge for organisations looking at their skills strategy is getting their job data under control. Discover how creating a single source of truth...

Artificial Intelligence, Globalisation

7 October 2025

Talent strategies for business expansion and growth

Global Expansion 2025: Powerful Talent Management Strategies for a Diverse and AI-Driven Workforce....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine – Human ResourcesSalary: £39,432 to £45,097 per annum (pro-rata) inclusive

Harper Adams University – Human ResourcesSalary: £46,049 to £50,253 per annum. Grade 10

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £27,319 to £31,236

Royal Conservatoire of ScotlandSalary: £52,074 to £58,611

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE