Employee with severe asthma wins appeal against unfair dismissal

In Brightman v TIAA Ltd Mrs Brightman had severe asthma and other conditions that meant she was disabled under the Equality Act. She had significant absences from work, despite adjustments to her working hours and type of work. These absences increased over time to around 35%. Her employer obtained medical evidence about her condition and decided that her absence levels were unlikely to improve and dismissed her for capability. Mrs Brightman claimed that the dismissal was unfair, disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

In Brightman v TIAA Ltd Mrs Brightman had severe asthma and other conditions that meant she was disabled under the Equality Act. She had significant absences from work, despite adjustments to her working hours and type of work. These absences increased over time to around 35%. Her employer obtained medical evidence about her condition and decided that her absence levels were unlikely to improve and dismissed her for capability. Mrs Brightman claimed that the dismissal was unfair, disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The employment tribunal dismissed her claims. It accepted that the dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses, relying on medical evidence that showed that Mrs Brightman’s health did not in fact improve. On that basis the employer could not have been expected to wait longer before taking the decision to dismiss. Mrs Brightman appealed.

The EAT allowed the appeal in relation to discrimination because of something arising in consequence of disability and a failure to make reasonable adjustments. In this case the tribunal had doubts about the adequacy of the medical information but had “filled the gap” with information about how Mrs Brightman’s medical condition had in fact progressed after the dismissal. That evidence was irrelevant to whether the employer had acted fairly in deciding to dismiss in the first place.

The unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims were sent back to a different employment tribunal for rehearing.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Wellbeing pays: the ROI HR can’t ignore

9 October 2025

Skills

7 October 2025

How to build a skills-based strategy

A key challenge for organisations looking at their skills strategy is getting their job data under control. Discover how creating a single source of truth...

Artificial Intelligence, Globalisation

7 October 2025

Talent strategies for business expansion and growth

Global Expansion 2025: Powerful Talent Management Strategies for a Diverse and AI-Driven Workforce....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine – Human ResourcesSalary: £39,432 to £45,097 per annum (pro-rata) inclusive This provides summary information and comment on the

Harper Adams University – Human ResourcesSalary: £46,049 to £50,253 per annum. Grade 10 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £27,319 to £31,236 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Royal Conservatoire of ScotlandSalary: £52,074 to £58,611 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE