Stress-related personal injury was reasonably foreseeable

Stress-related personal injury was reasonably foreseeable

In Dickens v O2 plc the Court of Appeal held that O2 was liable for stress induced personal injury suffered by one of its employees. The injury was reasonably foreseeable. The employee had previously complained about the stress of her job. In the circumstances, O2 had been negligent as it should have sent Mrs Dickens home pending urgent medical investigation.

Ms Dickins was promoted to an audit role and was promised training by an accountant who then left, leaving Ms Dickins to do the February 2002 audit alone. She worked long hours and reached “the end of her tether”. Ms Dickins had difficulty getting up and was regularly late for work. She told her manager that she was “stressed out” and he suggested she should use O2’s counselling service.

In May 2002 Ms Dickins repeated her description of her symptoms, confirmed that she was having counselling and but was concerned that her health was deteriorating. A referral to occupational health was suggested but not actioned. Shortly after she went sick with anxiety and depression and never returned.

The Court of Appeal held that O2 was liable for stress induced personal injury. The injury was reasonably foreseeable. The employee had previously complained about the stress of her job, had been coming into work late regularly and had told her line manager that she did not know how long she could keep going. O2 had been negligent as it should have sent Mrs Dickens home pending urgent medical investigation. The fact that confidential counselling was made available was not an adequate response where an employee was complaining of severe stress.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Wellbeing pays: the ROI HR can’t ignore

9 October 2025

Skills

7 October 2025

How to build a skills-based strategy

A key challenge for organisations looking at their skills strategy is getting their job data under control. Discover how creating a single source of truth...

Artificial Intelligence, Globalisation

7 October 2025

Talent strategies for business expansion and growth

Global Expansion 2025: Powerful Talent Management Strategies for a Diverse and AI-Driven Workforce....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine – Human ResourcesSalary: £39,432 to £45,097 per annum (pro-rata) inclusive This provides summary information and comment on the

Harper Adams University – Human ResourcesSalary: £46,049 to £50,253 per annum. Grade 10 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £27,319 to £31,236 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Royal Conservatoire of ScotlandSalary: £52,074 to £58,611 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE