Government publishes whistleblowing review

The UK government’s new whistleblowing report reveals gaps in PIDA protections, tribunal fairness and workplace culture, plus key reforms needed.

The government has published the findings of a research study into the effectiveness of the whistleblowing framework. The report evaluates how well the UK whistleblowing framework meets the original objectives of the Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA):

  • Providing a clear route for making whistleblowing disclosures
  • Protecting individuals from detrimental treatment or dismissal, with avenues for redress
  • Supporting cultural change, in which whistleblowing is recognized, understood, and acted upon

The research presents observations, emerging themes, and suggested areas for improvement, based on literature, interviews, focus groups, and secondary data analysis.

Key Findings

  1. Unclear Legal Definitions and Exclusions

Definitions for terms like “worker,” “reasonable belief,” and “public interest” are viewed as vague, subjective, and inconsistently applied. There is no statutory definition of “whistleblower” or “protection,” meaning tribunals and organisations must interpret eligibility and safeguarding on a case-by-case basis.

  1. Unreliable Disclosure Channels

Though some organisations have internal mechanisms, many lack accessible, trusted, or confidential processes for whistleblowing. Management buy-in and independence are inconsistent.

  1. Deficient Protections and Redress Mechanisms

Tribunal proceedings frequently fall short. Many participants felt the process is unbalanced or unrealistic, and tribunals may not deliver fair or adequate compensation.

  1. Lack of Awareness & Guidance

Many whistleblowers were unaware of their rights or the existence of official guidance when

  1. Cultural Barriers to Speaking Up

A robust “speak up” culture remains rare. Whistleblowers often face marginalisation, retaliation, and isolation—and internal resistance discourages reporting

The report outlines several areas for potential improvement:

  • Broaden definitions of “worker” and introduce statutory definitions for “whistleblower” and “public interest.”
  • Improve internal procedures and ensure every sector has a clear prescribed person.
  • Make redress mechanisms more practical, equitable, and accessible.
  • Distribute accessible, well-promoted material on whistleblower rights and protections for both individuals and organisations.
  • Encourage “speak-up” cultures that value transparency and address concerns without retaliation.

The report’s findings clearly show that the current whistleblowing framework is fragmented, uncertain, and frequently ineffective. Ambiguities in the law, limited access to fair redress, and cultural resistance undermine the very purpose of allowing individuals to speak up in the public interest.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Wellbeing pays: the ROI HR can’t ignore

9 October 2025

Skills

7 October 2025

How to build a skills-based strategy

A key challenge for organisations looking at their skills strategy is getting their job data under control. Discover how creating a single source of truth...

Artificial Intelligence, Globalisation

7 October 2025

Talent strategies for business expansion and growth

Global Expansion 2025: Powerful Talent Management Strategies for a Diverse and AI-Driven Workforce....

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine – Human ResourcesSalary: £39,432 to £45,097 per annum (pro-rata) inclusive This provides summary information and comment on the

Harper Adams University – Human ResourcesSalary: £46,049 to £50,253 per annum. Grade 10 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

University of Cambridge – Department of Clinical NeurosciencesSalary: £27,319 to £31,236 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Royal Conservatoire of ScotlandSalary: £52,074 to £58,611 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE